Should You Have An Injury Attorney After Car Accident?
After an accident, an injury attorney in Waterloo could help you to assemble your strongest arguments.
Compare your knowledge to that of a personal injury lawyer.
Lawyers have become familiar with the various laws in their state. An attorney’s knowledge would include an awareness of the state’s statute of limitations. That awareness would extend to a familiarity with the exceptions to the published statute of limitations.
You would be taking a risk if you tried to handle a case in which the other side has alleged the existence of shared blame.
Lawyers are better at responding to arguments from the opposing party.
A collection of the needed evidence could support an attorney’s argument. An attorney’s training and experience have equipped him/her to gather all the necessary evidence.
A strong demand letter could challenge one or more of the arguments that an adjuster has planned to make. That is why it pays to have an lawyer’s assistance, when composing that demand letter.
A personal injury attorney would have your interests in mind throughout the claims process.
The lawyer’s fee scale represents an effort to demonstrate his/her concern for your interests.
Some lawyers charge an up front fee; some charge by the hour.
The legal system wants you to be compensated for your losses. It expects lawyers to help victims that deserve to benefit from the system.
An attorney’s desire to protect your legal rights demonstrates his/her focus on the issues that should be of greatest importance to a given client.
Almost all clients want a fair compensation. Still, some are also out for revenge. Yet an effort aimed at enjoying revenge against the responsible party could end up causing a client to overlook a significant legal issue.
Why a lawyer’s guidance could prove especially helpful, if a client has chosen to pursue a 1st party claim.
After you have submitted that 1st party claim, you need to work with your own insurance company. Naturally, you should feel compelled to cooperate with your own insurer. Still, your insurance agency is hoping to make the smallest payout possible.
The adjuster has learned how to form arguments that can force a decrease in the payout’s size. For instance, the adjuster might claim that the evidence has suggested the existence of shared blame. That would mean a decrease in the size of the victim’s compensation.
If you are the client, should you cooperate with the adjuster, or fight for more money? If you have hired an attorney, then that member of the legal profession should be ready to take part in a potential fight.
A lawyer’s argument could challenge the veracity of the adjuster’s allegations. It could demand production of evidence. Few claimants/clients would have the ability to utilize that strategy.