What is an inevitable accident? It is one that would have happened anyway, regardless of what actions someone might have taken, that is the definition used in Canada, where a defense team has the right to suggest the inevitability of an accident as a defense for a client’s actions, or lack of action.
A court might award punitive damages, if a defendant in a personal injury case has displayed behavior that went beyond the category of simple negligence. In fact, the defendant’s outrageous actions could be likened to acts that exemplified gross negligence.
Suppose that you have consulted with one personal injury lawyer in Waterloo, and the same injury lawyer has refused to take your potential case. Should you seek the opinion of a second lawyer?
The reason that someone with a personal injury claim might decide to forge ahead without a personal injury lawyer in Waterloo should be easy to recognize. The whole list of reasons for thinking twice, regarding the wisdom behind such a move, might not enter the head of someone that lacked a strong legal background.
Not every injury caused by a car accident shows-up during the brief period when the drivers exchange their contact information. Some subtle symptoms get ignored during the days before the adjuster contacts the claimant, the person with the injuries and the damaged vehicle. Smart claimants learn how to deal with late-appearing symptoms.
Millions of cars and trucks transport passengers and goods every day. Sometimes, accidents take place. Here are some common questions about on-the-road incidents as personal injury lawyer in Waterloo.
Pain is difficult to measure. Even hospitals struggle to assess the level of pain experienced by any one patient. That fact underlines the challenge that faces insurers. Each of them must place a dollar value on every claimant’s case.
Lawyers help their clients to receive the maximum possible amount of money as compensation for lost income. A Personal Injury Lawyer in Waterloo understands the multiple factors that fall under the label of “lost income.”
Members of the public read about the large awards that are received by some plaintiffs, at the conclusion of a personal injury case. Why do a majority of claimants choose to accept an out-of-court settlement? The holding of a trial introduces an element of uncertainty.
Claimants that face some sort of challenge, when going after the compensation for a personal injury claim, have reason to consider the filing of a personal injury lawsuit. How should a claimant proceed, if he or she has decided to take such an action?