Single Blog Title

This is a single blog caption

What Factors Might Sway A Personal Injury Lawyer To Accept Or Deny A Given Case?

Any potential client that there is a long list of reasons that could push any personal injury lawyer in Waterloo to decide against taking a given case.

Timing of potential client

As a rule, lawyers do not like to take a case, if a potential plaintiff has scheduled a consultation just a few weeks before the deadline for filing a personal injury lawsuit.

The consultation might have disclosed the fact that the victim’s claim lacked a desirable level of strength. In other words, the defendant might be able to win in court, a possibility that would cancel out the lawyer’s chances for receiving any money.

Lawyers’ refusal to take certain cases could reflect their unease, with respect to the resources required, in order to win. The consulted attorney might lack all of those resources. The existence of a conflict of interest could push a consulted lawyer to decide against handling a given case.

An attorney’s personal reasons could also play a part in the same attorney’s decision, with respect to the wisdom behind accepting a potential client.

How any potential client could increase the chances that a given lawyer would elect to take on his or her particular case/claim.

Those possible clients that manage to offer a complete and clear picture of the accident that caused their injury stand the best chance for becoming one half of a team, with the consulted professional as the other half of that same team.

Clients’ expectations also work to determine their chances for getting a member of the legal profession to handle their efforts at winning compensation. Those that expect to win a huge sum of money have the slimmest chance for teaming up with such a professional.

If an accident victim were to appear less than honest, when describing the accidental incident to a given attorney, then that attitude would undermine any chances for winning the same attorney’s acceptance, as an advocate for the seemingly dishonest victim.

Anyone that has given thought to retaining an attorney should understand the need to trust the same attorney’s judgment. The absence of that element of trust would make the chances for formation of a lawyer-client team rather dim.

So, how would a potential client demonstrate such trust? He or she would not use one lawyer for a bit, and then switch to a different one. That would all but eliminate the likelihood that the first relationship could be saved.

Trust also goes with honesty. Clients’ honesty serves as a demonstration of their trust. Some victims refuse to seek a lawyer’s assistance, because, in their minds at least, lawyers’ desire to win reflects a desire for money that has not really been earned.